Eigg Workshop March 2024

I’m just finishing up a workshop I ran this past week on the isle of Eigg here in Scotland. Below is a ‘portfolio’ example created by the participants work during this week’s workshop.

As part of my Scottish workshops, I always take a high quality digital projector along, so we can review and edit participants work throughout the week. My aim in doing this is many:

  1. most photographers tend to undervalue what they shoot, and it is only in editing the work that I can often show that what may have appeared to be an average shot upon first review, is actually an image that holds great promise.

  2. Editing is an undervalued skill, often viewed as nothing more than just a post-exercise in tidying up an image, when in fact it is a life-long skill in bringing an image to it’s full potential.

  3. to instruct on how compositions could have been tighter / simpler.

  4. to instruct on how choice of subject equals choice of luminosity, and how tonal separation play an important part in image composition

  5. localised contrast selection can make a huge difference to simplifying / aiding composition.

  6. Adobe’s advice to punch up the RAW file in the RAW editor, is fundamentally the wrong approach to delivering images that selectively lead the eye through the frame whilst maintaining soft tonalities and conveying ‘punch and depth’ at the same time.

  7. Luminosity can be edited to lead the eye through the frame.

  8. Subjects appear to stand out better if you spend time quietening their surroundings.

  9. Editing informs fieldwork. Not the other way round. You will become a more selective shooter / composer if you work at your editing.

As part of all my Scottish workshops, I aim to bring the images from all participants together at the end of the week into a cohesive set. I think portfolio development is the key to finding one’s own style, and conveying it to your audience. During the week I start off by editing everyone’s images on an individual basis, but as the week progresses, I show how to go from what may appear to be a random collection of images to a cohesive set. This is done through not just selection, but also editing the images together.

It was a good week this week. The images did start off as a rather random set, but as the week progressed I felt I was able to show how just the six above could feel more cohesive, not simply by what was removed to make the final set glue together better, but also in how iterative editing between this final set brought them together.

Many thanks to Caroline, Mike, Paul J, Paul M, Matthias and Peter for coming all the way to Eigg with me.

Share

Airport Scanners and Film

My latest experience of going through airports with my film has made me decide to take ISO800 and above film with me now. Let me explain.

At Edinburgh airport I was informed that all film below 800 ISO had to go through the scanner, and that the scanner was safe for any ISO below that number. I know for a fact that film is not safe below even 400 for regular old fashioned scanners, and for the new CT scanners (which are rapidly being rolled out everywhere) even one single pass is detrimental to the films.

At Paris Charles de Gaulle, they have introduced CT scanners. I managed to get the film hand checked. But it’s not going to work all the time by asking. In Buenos Aires they told me the scanner was film safe (it degrades the film) and I was forced to put it through.

So I think the best plan is to turn up with films that are above 800 ISO and tell them you have very high speed film and need a hand search. I think that might just work.

If you can, buy the film locally at your destination and perhaps see if you can find somewhere to process it for you and post to to your home address.

Share

Tone Paintings

“We are mostly light seekers
”We use subjects only to support the light that we have found

I was looking at these images recently and received the comment that they are ‘tone paintings’. It got me thinking about whether they are. I know for sure that I am more interested in tone and gradation rather than subject matter. For instance, I prefer to work with weather conditions which give atmosphere to the imagery. When you use rain to obliterate backgrounds, things become less literal, and more subjective. It seems that I am seldom drawn to a scene these days as a ‘subject’, but more for it’s hue / colour and luminosity properties.

When I enquired and looked back at some of my other portfolios I became aware that this form of photography - of creating ‘tone paintings’ is something that I have gravitated towards over some years now. I am less and less inclined to be drawn to a place because it is a strong literal subject, but more because of the hue / colour and luminosity properties.

If I reach further back, it seems that I have always been interested in this the most, but I had tried to think of hue / colour and luminosity as properties of the subjects I was shooting, and not perhaps the main point of the reason why I made the photos.

Lençóis Maranhenses below is a good example of that. I do not think these images are of sand dunes (well, they are), but that is not the purpose for shooting them. I use dunes (as most of us do) to convey tonal gradation, colour gradation, and perhaps as a relief to study these properties alone, rather than get confused by trying to attach them to a particular subject. In a way, the hues, luminosities are the subjects of these images.

So I suppose what I am really trying to say is that although we are often looking for good subjects to photograph, we wrongly make the assumption that the light is what helps make the image more interesting. When in fact I would say that it is the other way round: we use subjects to support the qualities of light we find. We are mostly light seekers, and subject seekers only to support the light that we have found.

Share

Free to compose more anonymous, less obvious shots

It’s taken me a while to realise that since I started to focus more on portfolio sets (as they convey, or help push you towards a style), that I’ve found myself including images that are more anonymous, or perhaps less obvious as contenders to help support the portfolio set.

Portfolios in a way, although they may stipulate constraints so that the images conform to a look or a feel, have in a way allowed me to go looking for compositions in the landscape that might not feel immediately apparent as a strong contender as an individual image, but instead, help or be a supporting image in a set.

I think there is a danger in always looking for the Alpha shot, and discarding the Beta shots as a result. We’re so intent on looking for those images that have a strong composition etc, that they are perhaps too powerful to be included in a set, because they would compete, rather than work with the others.

I got told a while ago that my imagery had moved away from the less iconic shots to a more abstract view. I think this is true, but it wasn’t a conscious decision: it just happened, and I think it mostly came about by my fascination on working on sets of images.

Share

Make the landscape your own

“For me, the ultimate goal is to be able to find myself in the images I make.”

“I just think that even if I tried to get as far away from myself as possible,
I would still be there in my own work.”

There are two ways you can look at photography. One is to think that when you photograph something, you are recording it for posterity. Bundled into this is the belief that the photograph is a realistic impression of reality. Then there is the other way you can look at photography: as a personal expression where you are trying to show others what you saw and felt. I don’t think both can coexist as I think they are mutually exclusive or at the very least, contradictory from each other.

I have this old friend of mine, Steven Feinstein, whom is probably nearing his late 90’s now. He came on a few trips with me about 8 years ago, and said something which I thought could be taken one of two ways. He said ‘Bruce you seem to go anywhere in the world, and make the same photo’. The context of him saying this was that he was being friendly and supportive. It did not come over as a criticism, but more an observation. I said to him ‘well, I think I will take that as a compliment’, because what I saw in his statement was that he was saying ‘wherever you go, your photos look like you’.

Well, whether that is what he meant or not, it gave me pause to consider that I think this is what I am most interested in. I do not wish to record something the way it was, I wish to find my own view. I am sure some (but not all) of you are like this also. You wish to find your own take on something, or to show others what you saw or felt.

For me, the ultimate goal is to be able to find myself in the images I make.

Reviewing the set of portfolios of images below, perhaps Steven was right; wherever I go, I make the same photo. I really don’t mind if this is true. I’d actually find it quite a compliment. Because I think we all want our images to be instantly recognised as ours.

I’ve had time to let my style surface, to be more apparent to myself. I am of the mind that I’m extremely lucky. Not everyone figures out if they have a style, or may even have one.

I’m at a point now that my style is so far established that even if I tried to get as far away from myself as possible, I would still be there in my own work.

But for most of us, we don’t know if we have a style, and the problem is, being able to find yourself in what you produce. That is the million dollar quest. Because I am convinced it is not so easy for ourselves to be objective about what we do. I believe the biggest blind spot we have, is in seeing ourselves. This is because it is incredibly difficult to recognise our own strengths and weaknesses. We do not know ourselves, and in a way, photography is the process of working through that.

I believe the only way to find ourselves in our own work, is to continually review, continually create collections of our work, and to continually think about how they relate to each other.

Sets of images below:

  • Puna de Atacama, Argentina

  • Lençóis Maranhenses, Brazil,

  • Bolivian Altiplano, Bolivia,

  • Hokkaido, Japan,

  • Central Highlands of Iceland

All different countries, all different landscapes, but somehow they all look stylistically similar. That is where I find ‘me’ in my own work. How about you?

Share

Letting your impressions guide you

I spent a week around mount Fuji this January. I will refer to Mt `Fuji as ‘Fuji San’ for the rest of this post.

For many years now, I have found that while away for a week or two making photographs, I often build up an impression in my mind as to how the work is progressing. This impression may be as vague as simply knowing that I have encountered enough scenes to produce a portfolio of maybe six to nine images. Or it may be more concrete. I may have two or three very strong compositions floating around my mind.

I am a strong believer in trusting my impressions: if I find a scene that is strong, and feel I’ve found a solid composition of it, then the image will tend to linger in my mind for the remainder of my time away.

Since I am a film shooter, I cannot review my work until I return home and get the films processed, so I have found that impressions are incredibly valuable in guiding my creativity.

I think building up an impression of your imagery as you go through a week’s photography is a good skill to develop. I would say: when I started out, I often found there was a huge disconnect between what I had seen and what I had actually captured. As the years have rolled on and my experience has grown, I find that there is less of a disconnect between what my impressions were, and what I actually got in camera.

I have never heard of anyone else talk about this, but I think developing an awareness for how the shoot is progressing is something we should all do. I would wager a bet that most of us tend to build up an intuitive feeling about the images we’re collecting over a week or two of shooting, but I’m not sure that most of us take it any further than this.

With regards to my shoot around Fuji San, I had the overriding feeling that the set was going to have a stark look to it. There were one or two images that were lurking around in my mind but they didn’t feel compositionally strong. They remained in my mind because of the atmosphere that I was immersed in whilst making them. These are the lake shots you see here.

I have found that my own criteria for what I’m looking for has changed over the years; if I can find strong compositions this is great, but if not, I can easily work with places where atmosphere and light compensate for any lack in subject interest. I would put this down to experience. I have made many portfolios that are about the quality of the light rather than subjects.

The weather during my week had been mixed, but I had noticed that most of the images that were floating around my mind had come about during days when it was snowing quite heavily. I had a hunch that the final resulting set would be fairly monochromatic as a result. But that was really about as far as it went.

All this gave me, was the overall feeling that I had enough images to make a portfolio, and that they were going to be centred around the light rather than any solid subjects. I was aware that I had made a few shots of Fuji San, which didn’t quite fit into the same category; they were unashamedly subject related: the mountain was all consuming. When returning home I remember thinking on the plane how I could marry the more etherial shots with the more traditional ones of Fuji San. I also considered that it was perhaps fortuitous that there were no contenders in the more anonymous shots to compete with Fuji San. The portfolio would be a collection of images of the volcano, and more supportive, secondary shots that provided more of a context than anything.

Lastly, although I love listening to the impressions that I build up whilst on location, as they help steer me, or perhaps just give me confidence to keep going, I do not religiously hold to any ideas I had while on location. I am no fan of pre-visualising the final work. I am more than happy to come home and whilst editing the work, if I feel the work wants to take a very different route, then I go with it. Pre-visualisation in any form is tantamount to creative-constipation in my view. I do like to listen to how I am feeling about the work I’m producing whilst on location, but it is only as a guide. It allows me to make the work, but it does not instruct me on how to edit it once home.

Share