I am not a photographer

It’s far too limiting a badge to wear.

When I first got into the arts as a kid, I was a painter. I had thought that painting would stay with me. As a boy between the ages of 5 and 12, I had not seen me doing anything other than painting. But at 12 I found music, and that engulfed me, so much so that painting was cast aside. Until around the age of 34 I did nothing but music, and then I hit a brick wall with it. Since then it has been photography, until around 5 years ago when music re-entered my life. I now spend a lot of my time working on music as I do photography.

I now realise that what I was doing in the past was putting badges on what I do. Or perhaps compartmentalising what I do.

I find auditory things just as inspiring as I do visual things. To me, they are one and the same. I can get as much inspiration from music as I do from looking at other’s photography. Truth be told: I rarely look at other’s photography these days. I think it’s a symptom of photography now being my ‘job’, or ‘vocation’. I feel I was meant to do photography, and I have little bandwidth left for looking at other’s work, and if I do have it, I’d much rather spend it on listening to music, which is where I get a lot of my inspiration from these days.

Surely, what photography does for all of us, is allow us to focus on one of our sensory perceptions in a way that we ordinarily wouldn’t? It is a rarity to be able to stop and stare at something for a prolonged period of time. To stand and enjoy it. That is the core of why we all photograph I believe. We are in pursuit of the visual without anything else getting in the way.

I find the same with sound. Being able to enjoy the quality of sound, or simply have the awareness of the sounds around me, is a kind of music in its own way. And yet I see parallels to what I do with my interest in the visual world.

Music is frequencies, and colour and luminance of tone are also frequencies. All visual and audio artists focus on the beauty of how frequencies interact. All musicians and photographers are observers. That is what we do. We study the interaction of light or of sound depending on which medium we focus on.

Share

Website updates to portraiture gallery

I’ve been nudged to update / refresh my portraiture page on this very website. As much as I am just as passionate about making photographs of people as I am of landscapes, I’m aware that the majority of my audience isn’t interested in portraiture. Which is, in my view, a bit of a shame that we tend to compartmentalise what we like : to me, photographs are photographs.

The biggest problem I had with my portraiture webpage was that the images were too small. They are now much larger, so you can hopefully enjoy the detail of my subject’s clothing and perhaps see their spirit in their eyes more clearly. Additionally, whilst doing this job today, I came across a few images that I now wonder ‘why did I not publish these?’ Distance is a great thing, and I would it deeply enjoyable being reacquainted with these forgotten about images.

I am so keen to go and make some more street photos !

I have been focussing on landscapes only, for such a long time now, and although I feel my landscape work is much better than my portraiture, that should not be a reason not to enjoy making images of people. It is a great ‘escape’ from my passion for landscape work. Taking a break, a step back, or doing something different for a while is always good for the soul and I would advise to find some alternative interests to your photography. Time away from it doing something else, often reaps rewards when you do return to it.

So I am hatching plans now to go make some more people pictures this coming year.

If you choose to look at my portraiture web page, I hope you enjoy the images at much larger sizes (just click on them), and even if you aren’t that interested in portraiture, consider this: Portraits are really landscapes of the human soul.

Share

Domke Wrap Update

I promised an update about the Domke 19” protective wrap. I bought one with the intention of trying it out as a hood / shelter for when it is raining, and in particular, to see if it is rigid enough to act as a cover around a set of filters on the front of the camera.

I took the Domke to Iceland with me. We didn’t have much rain during our tour (the sunniest days I had experienced), but when it did rain, it really rained. So on those very difficult rainy days I tried out the cloth.

My opinion about any new gear, is that you have to use it for a year at the very least. Making a decision about something after just a few uses has proven to not be objective enough for me in the past. The ball head I thought was great for instance, turned out to have too short a clamp for my camera bracket and I lost my camera to a river. The bag that I did not like because I thought it was simply too big for my filter set has turned out to be one of my favourite bags of all time (Kinesis 10 filter bag). It is always the things that I did not consider that trip me up in the long run. I have also learned that the things I will find a ‘feature’ rather than a ‘bug’ only surface over repeated use.

Right now, I think the Domke has the potential to be a cloth I will keep on using. In Iceland I found I got shots I would not have in the past. Using it as a hood was stable enough in moderate wind, and it prevented rain dripping down the filters - particularly if the rain was coming from behind me (which for some reason is usually a rare event!) and the sides.

To make the cloth rigid, I tuck one corner of it at the top : see the above picture. The cloth has a plastic membrane on one side which I found to be 100% waterproof. The red felt / velcro type surface doesn’t get too damp either, and so the structure of the cloth is that it can be folded into a certain robust shape that will stay in moderate wind.

Of course, nothing will protect filters from rain coming towards the filter, but I did find that the reduction in rain hitting the filter from the top, sides and behind, was reduced by 100%, and once the filter was installed, I didn’t have to worry much about the front of the filter. I found I only had one surface to worry about, which was always what I was hoping this cloth would provide, and it did provide this.

On cleaning filters in the rain: to dry a filter in wet weather, use a chamois leather cloth. It is the only thing I know that will suck up all the rain and wipe the filter clear). I have tried micro fibre cloths, and lens cloths and tissue and none of these actually remove the water, or they produce a smear. A chamois removes the rain and leaves the filter mostly smear free.

I also found operating the camera once the wrap was installed was not much of a big problem. The cloth has velcro corners and you just unstick one to re-adjust the tightness. It’s very quick and easy. I had been concerned that I might undo it all to get access to the shutter button or film wind controls - I would say that with practice, you will find a process that works for you whereby you don’t need to do much to your camera (using a cable release for instance), but when I did have to undo the wrap to gain access, I could loosen it off enough and velcro it to a new position to allow my hands in.

Additionally, I found it was just a great way of being able to cover the entire camera when moving around. I could un-tuck the top flap, and bring it down over the entire filter set, and velcro it in place. The entire camera and filters were securely covered from any rain as I walked around the landscape looking for another shot.

The wrap was originally designed as a protective cover - something you can put around your ball head for instance, so there is sufficient padding and keeps it away from the dirt and rain. It is also just useful in the bag for things you feel you’d like to have some protection around. So even if it does not work as a rain filter, it is still a valuable tool to have. In fact, I would suggest that buying the 11” or 15” Domke protective wrap for your ball head is a must. Particularly if your ball head is sitting in the back of a car or getting thrown around on a tour or workshop. The wrap that I am reviewing here is the 19” one, which there is more about below.

Perhaps in a few years I may decide the Domke didn’t work in the long run. I might find the material gets too soft over time, as new, it has a certain rigidity to it. But right now, I am keeping it packed in my camera bag as I think it helped me get around 25% more images that I wouldn’t have been able to shoot in Iceland.

If you are considering buying it, there are three sizes that I know of: 11”, 15” and 19”. I bought the larger 19” model. I would recommend you get that one as it is big enough to wrap around the entire camera body and filter set. I am sure the 13” version would not be large enough. I have also placed an order for the 11” wrap, as a second wrap for my ball head when putting it in the boot of my car.

Share